Suharto's population policy in contemporary Indonesia : family planning program, marriage act or compulsory education has the greatest impact to fertility decline?
PDF

Keywords

population policy
contemporary Indonesia
Suharto

How to Cite

Widyastari, D. A., & Isarabhakdi, P. (2016). Suharto’s population policy in contemporary Indonesia : family planning program, marriage act or compulsory education has the greatest impact to fertility decline?. Public Health of Indonesia, 2(2), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.36685/phi.v2i2.63

Abstract

Fertility in Indonesia has been falling significantly, from an average total fertility rate of 5.6 children per women in 1970s to 4.1 in 1980, and 2.6 in 2010. This paper attempts to explore which and how Suharto's population policies have played role in Indonesia's fertility decline. Whilst the adoption of modern contraceptive was perceived as the major determinant of fertility decline in Indonesia, changes in Indonesia's political order and socio-economic development also contribute a considerable effect to Indonesians' familial norms. The implementation of  9-year compulsory education had placed a strong foundation for the future Indonesian human capital and enabled women to obtain higher opportunities for schooling. Beside facilitates the diffusion of ideas among young people and opened up their perspective toward reproductive rights and self actualization, education also increases women's opportunities to participate in laborforce. With the increasing roles outside the domestic sector, delaying age of marriage and limiting family size becomes a choice for women in contemporary Indonesia. The marriage act, however, was perceived as an accelerator rather than a predictor in increasing age of first marriage. Regardless the existence of the Marriage Law 1974, age of first marriage is likely to increase with increasing of education, although maybe in a slower rate.

https://doi.org/10.36685/phi.v2i2.63
PDF

References

CBS. Indonesian Population Census 1971. Jakarta: Statistics Indonesia;1974.

CBS. Indonesian Population Census 1980. Jakarta Statistics Indonesia; 1980.

Indonesian Population Census 1990. Statistics Indonesia; 1991.

CBS. Indonesian Population Census 2000. Jakarta: Statistics Indonesia;2000.

CBS. Indonesian Population Census 2010. Jakarta: Statistics Indonesia;2010.

McNicoll G. Recent demographic trends in Indonesia. Population and Development Review. 1982:811-819.

Hull TH. Fertility decline in Indonesia: an institutionalist interpretation. International Family Planning Perspectives. 1987:90-95.

Hugo GJ, Hull TH, Hull V, Jones GW. The Demographic Dimension in Indonesia Development. Singapore: Oxford University Press; 1986.

McNicoll G, Singarimbun M. Fertility decline in Indonesia: Analysis and interpretation. Vol 20: National Academies; 1983.

Hull TH. Caught in transit: Questions about the future of Indonesian fertility. Completing the fertility transition. population bulletin of the United Nations. 2009:375-388.

Gertler PJ, Molyneaux JW. How economic development and family planning programs combined to reduce Indonesian fertility. Demography. 1994;31(1):33-63.

McNicoll G, Singarimbun M. Fertility decline in Indonesia: Background and Proximate Determinants. Vol 20: National Academies; 1983.

CBS, NFPCB. Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Jakarta2007.

CBS, NFPCB. Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey 2012. Jakarta2013.

CBS, NFPCB. Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 1997. Jakarta: Central Buerou of Statistics;1998.

Bongaarts J. A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and development review. 1978:105-132.

Davis K, Blake J. Social structure and fertility: An analytic framework. Economic development and cultural change. 1956:211-235.

Malhotra A. Gender and the Timing of Marriage: Rural-Urban Differences in Java. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1997;59(2):434-450.

Kroef JMvd. Woman and the Changing Marriage Pattern of Indonesia. The American Catholic Sociological Review. 1957;18(2):113-127.

Guest P. Marital Dissolution and Development in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 1992;23(1):95-113.

Jones GW. Which Indonesian Women Marry Youngest, and Why? Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 2001;32(1):67-78.

Boserup E. Population and technological change: A study of long-term trends. 1981.

Boserup E. Woman's role in economic development: Earthscan; 2007.

Bulatao RA, Casterline JB. Global fertility transition: Population Council New York; 2001.

Buckles K. Understanding the Returns to Delayed Childbearing for Working Women. The American Economic Review. 2008;98(2):403-407.

Rindfuss RR, Bumpass L, St. John C. Education and Fertility: Implications for the Roles Women Occupy. American Sociological Review. 1980;45(3):431-447.

Samarakoon S, Parinduri RA. Does Education Empower Women? Evidence from Indonesia. World Development. 2// 2015;66:428-442.

Heaton TB. Socioeconomic and Familial Status of Women Associated With Age at First Marriage in Three Islamic Societies. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 1996;27(1):41-58.

Blackburn S, Bessell S. Marriageable Age: Political Debates on Early Marriage in Twentieth-Century Indonesia. Indonesia. 1997(63):107-141.

Katz JS, Katz RS. Legislating social change in a developing country: the new Indonesian marriage law revisited. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1978:309-320.

Cammack M, Young LA, Heaton T. Legislating Social Change in an Islamic Society-Indonesia's Marriage Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1996;44(1):45-73.

Alison MB, Nobles J. Ethnic diversity, traditional norms, and marriage behaviour in Indonesia. Population Studies. 2009;63(3):277-294.

Malhotra A. Gender and Changing Generational Relations: Spouse Choice in Indonesia. Demography. 1991;28(4):549-570.

Authors who publish with Public Health of Indonesia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the authors' work non-commercially, and although the others' new works must also acknowledge the authors and be non-commercial, they don't have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). Authors can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.